Short Investment Ideas
- 10%+ Upside or less to Analyst Price Targets
- Loved, Liquid & Late List of Stocks that are poised for downside
- Highest Short Interest
- Most Expensive list
- Accounting Trouble
- Proprietary Oddsmaker Estimate of Fair Value for each Stock
- Proprietary Oddsmaker Ranking of each stock with a score of +200 to -500
- Proprietary Multiple Predictor Scores is the business results vs. business valuation rankings
- Proprietary Letter Grades on how the company compares to the rest of public equity in customized formulas for understanding Value, Quality, Moat, Balance Sheet, Timing
- Proprietary Risk Sorting/Flagging system for Longs and shorts to efficiently source timely investment ideas
High Valuation Multiples (P/E, P/B, EV/EBITDA)
Research: Fama and French’s three-factor model (1992) is one of the most cited studies that supports the idea that stocks with high valuation multiples, such as Price-to-Earnings (P/E) and Price-to-Book (P/B) ratios, tend to underperform in the long run. The study shows that value stocks (those with low P/E and P/B ratios) generally outperform growth stocks (those with high P/E and P/B ratios) over extended periods. This suggests that stocks with inflated valuations are more likely to see corrections and underperformance as market expectations adjust.
Key Finding: Overvalued stocks often have too much optimism priced in, making them vulnerable to negative earnings surprises and market corrections.
Low Earnings Quality and High Accruals
Research: Sloan (1996) in his seminal paper, “Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows about Future Earnings?” found that companies with high accruals relative to their earnings tend to underperform. This is because high accruals can indicate earnings manipulation or unsustainable earnings levels, leading to future underperformance as the true financial health of the company is revealed.
Key Finding: Stocks with poor earnings quality and high accruals often experience declines as markets adjust to the reality of their financial situation.
High Short Interest
Research: Asquith, Pathak, and Ritter (2005) in their study, “Short Interest, Institutional Ownership, and Stock Returns,” found that stocks with high short interest generally underperform the broader market. High short interest reflects widespread bearish sentiment among investors who anticipate the stock price will decline due to factors such as poor fundamentals, overvaluation, or negative news.
Key Finding: Stocks with significant short interest are often under pressure and may continue to decline as negative factors play out.
Research: A study by Nissim and Penman (2001), “Ratio Analysis and Equity Valuation: From Research to Practice,” shows that companies with declining profitability metrics, such as profit margins and Return on Equity (ROE), tend to underperform the market. These metrics are crucial indicators of a company’s efficiency and competitive position. Declining margins often signal increased competition, rising costs, or inefficiencies, leading to lower future earnings and stock performance.
Key Finding: Companies with declining profitability are often unable to sustain their market position, leading to underperformance.
Poor Corporate Governance and Accounting Red Flags
Research: Gompers, Ishii, and Metrick (2003) in their study, “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices,” found that companies with weak corporate governance structures tend to underperform. Poor governance can lead to management making decisions that are not in the best interests of shareholders, such as excessive risk-taking, poor capital allocation, or even fraud.
Key Finding: Weak corporate governance often leads to mismanagement and underperformance, as the company’s leadership fails to protect shareholder value.
Research: A study by Lang, Ofek, and Stulz (1996), “Leverage, Investment, and Firm Growth,” found that companies with high levels of debt relative to equity or earnings (high leverage) tend to underperform, particularly in economic downturns. High debt levels increase financial risk and can lead to distress or bankruptcy, especially if the company’s cash flow is insufficient to meet its obligations.
Key Finding: Overleveraged companies are more vulnerable to economic fluctua
Research: Malmendier and Tate (2005) in their study, “CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment,” show that overconfident CEOs tend to overinvest in projects with poor returns, leading to company underperformance. Behavioral biases at the management level, such as overconfidence, can result in poor strategic decisions, overexpansion, and value destruction.
Key Finding: Companies led by overconfident or biased management often underperform due to inefficient capital allocation and risk management.
Research: A study by Yermack (1997), “Good Timing: CEO Stock Option Awards and Company News Announcements,” suggests that excessive stock-based compensation, particularly when tied to short-term performance metrics, can lead to a focus on short-term gains at the expense of long-term shareholder value. This misalignment can lead to underperformance as the company’s long-term strategic goals are sacrificed for short-term stock price boosts.
Key Finding: Excessive stock-based compensation can lead to short-termism, harming long-term performance and leading to underperformance.
Launch Price
$12.99/ month
